Fed’s Outgoing Vice Chair Richard Clarida’s ‘Rebalancing’ Trades Ignite Fed Trading Ethics Scandal – Economics Bitcoin News

US Federal Reserve members are under fire this week after the central bank released its December 14-15 policy meeting minutes. Following the update, the Fed’s outgoing vice president of business has reignited conversations about ethics.

Richard Clarida’s trade under scrutiny

The US central bank could rattle the markets and this was seen earlier this week when the Federal Reserve published its policy meeting update last month which indicated the Fed’s plans to raise interest rates and cut quantitative easing (QE). Not long after, The New York Times (New York Times) published a new disclosure report on the outgoing Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Richard Clarida.

Gina Smyalek, author of The New York Times, wrote that “corrected disclosures show Vice President Richard H. Clarida sold a stock fund, then quickly repurchased it before the big Fed announcement.” The reporter added that “Clarida, the departing Fed Vice Chair, failed to initially reveal the extent of the financial deal he did in early 2020 as the Fed was preparing to pounce on the markets and bail them out amid the outbreak of the pandemic.”

Trades carried out by Kaplan and Powell criticized in the past, Obama’s previous managerial ethic officially describes Clarida’s careers as “weird”

This is not the first time that members of the US central bank have been criticized for their actions bargains. Last September, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) published an article revealing that Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan “has made several stock trades worth $1 million plus in 2020, according to a financial disclosure form submitted by his bank.” The controversy prompted Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell to instruct his staff to launch an ethical investigation into the financial activities of Federal Reserve members.

Smialek’s report shows Clarida’s deals being described as a “rebalancing” and Clarida describing the discrepancies as “unintentional mistakes”. Peter Conti-Brown, a Federal Reserve Bank historian at the University of Pennsylvania, told Smyalek that the issue with Fed members is “extremely problematic.” Norman Eisen, the Obama administration’s ethics official, told a New York Times reporter that it was “strange.”

“It is fair to ask – in what area does this rebalancing constitute?” Note Aizen as well.

Fed members are largely scrutinized for the trades they made before the monetary easing policies related to Covid-19 progressed. Clarida’s deals, in particular, were reportedly settled the day before Powell announced the Fed’s emergency measures to help boost the economy. The Fed member’s alleged deals have caused politicians such as Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) to call on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to investigate ethical issues.

Tags in this story

Chairman, Code of Conduct, Dallas Fed President, Democratic Senator, Elizabeth Warren, Ethics, Ethics Inquiry, Fed Chair, Fed Chairs, Fed Spokesperson, Fed Vice President, Federal Reserve, Gina Smyalek, Jerome Powell, Department of Justice, New York Times, New York Times, Outgoing Vice President, Richard Clarida, Robert Kaplan, Stock Trading

What do you think of the Fed members who have been scrutinized and criticized this week for their stock trading? Tell us what you think about it in the comments section below.

Jimmy Redman

Jamie Redman is the head of news at Bitcoin.com News and a technology financial journalist based in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 5,000 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.




photo credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the Company nor the author shall be liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Leave a Comment